Security & site protection
Connect perimeter, access and interior monitoring to support the people responsible for protecting your site — from its first construction phase through everyday operation.
coverage
Start with the boundary, follow activity through entrances, and extend visibility into the spaces that matter.
Configure monitoring around fences, gates, service roads and other defined approaches. Potential intrusion or unusual movement can be brought to the security team with relevant camera context.
Evaluate tailgating and unusual entry activity alongside compatible access-control information. Security teams review the context and follow the agreed response process.
Extend configured monitoring to corridors, equipment rooms, service spaces and restricted areas. Evaluate unusual dwell, entry or visual changes around protected equipment.
Connect an alert to the relevant location and available camera evidence. Define who reviews the event, how it is recorded, and how it passes into the site’s incident workflow.
site lifecycle
The monitoring plan should evolve as the site, its people and its access routes change.
| Phase | Focus | What teams define |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | Temporary gates, contractor work areas, deliveries and changing boundaries. | Update coverage and zones as work progresses; identify who owns access and event review. |
| Commissioning | Mixed contractor and operations activity around increasingly sensitive systems. | Separate handover areas and restricted spaces; review permissions and escalation ownership. |
| Operation | Workers, visitors, service contractors and routine maintenance. | Review exceptions against the site’s operating pattern and adapt the monitoring scope as needs change. |
Worker safety scenarios, including person-down or physical-hazard alerts, can be evaluated under actual site conditions. They support defined safety procedures and human review; this is not employee productivity scoring.
integrations
Select the inputs that help teams understand an event, rather than adding systems without a clear operating purpose.
Edge visual processing can be combined with compatible site systems to give operators relevant context. Integration scope is established around the equipment, connectivity and workflows available.
assessment
Start with a map of the environment, the situations to evaluate, and the people responsible for review before expanding the configured scope.
Review the site map, camera inventory, lighting, blind spots and connectivity. Mark where visual information is available and where the assessment needs a different input.
Identify fences, gates, service roads, approaches, entrances, interiors and restricted areas. Include phase-specific worker, contractor and delivery routes as the site changes.
Review access-control and perimeter-sensor interfaces. Assess optional drone viewpoints for feasibility, operating constraints and clear ownership before including them.
Select event scenarios, the responsible reviewer, escalation or dispatch ownership, data access and retention, and the method used to review the pilot.
Assessment outputs are conditional and site-specific: a mapped scope, defined workflows, agreed data handling and a pilot review plan. They do not establish guaranteed coverage, response time or performance.
Signal: camera context plus a compatible access event. Human review: the responsible security team checks the route and surrounding activity. Output: the agreed escalation or incident-review path.
Signal: a changing zone map, contractor route or handover condition. Human review: site leads confirm permissions and coverage ownership. Output: an updated map and operating decision.
Signal: a camera, sensor or optional drone viewpoint. Human review: an operator checks the condition and records the inspection action. Output: documented follow-up for the responsible team.
Signal: a configured alert evaluated under actual site conditions. Human review: the safety team follows the site procedure. Output: a human-reviewed event record; this does not score worker productivity.
response
A useful alert needs a destination and a clear next step.
Analyze configured camera views for selected events and patterns.
Give the responsible team available visual evidence and location context.
Follow the site’s agreed escalation, dispatch or incident-review procedure.
Review event quality and adjust zones, scenarios and workflows during the pilot and subsequent operation.
24/7 describes the intended AI monitoring operation. Coverage, system availability, staffing, data handling and response responsibilities are agreed for each deployment. Performance is evaluated through a site-specific pilot.
applications
Perimeter protection applies wherever people, boundaries and sensitive spaces need coordinated oversight.
Connect visitor approaches, working areas and restricted interiors across commercial properties, campuses and industrial facilities.
Apply the same approach to construction access, operational personnel, data halls and supporting infrastructure. Explore the specialized example within the wider applications portfolio.
Explore data centers →Start with your environment
Discuss your priorities, existing infrastructure, and the outcomes your team needs to evaluate.
Request an assessment